We reported earlier about the second day of hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee for SCOTUS nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson. I wrote earlier about Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) exposing some of the problems in Judge Jackson’s answers.

But Jackson also got into some trouble when she was asked about why she imposed lenient sentences for child porn offenders.

Here’s one of the troubling answers that she gave on Monday, suggesting that the reason that she may have gone lighter on some of the sentences was that she thought the sentencing guidelines were outdated or not keeping up with the nature of the internet.

BREAKING: During her Senate Confirmation Hearing, Judge Jackson criticizes congressional statutes and the Sentencing Guidelines, saying the guidelines are not up to date and are too harsh for child porn offenders.pic.twitter.com/4EHkHk3uRG

— Election Wizard 🇺🇸 (@ElectionWiz) March 22, 2022

Except that it isn’t up to her to change the sentencing guidelines by fiat if that’s what she’s saying here.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) asked her about that regarding this case, where he said the sentencing guideline said 10 years and she gave three months.

WATCH: Senator @HawleyMO asks Ketanji Brown Jackson about giving a heinous child predator a three-month prison sentence when federal guidelines suggested 10 years and federal prosecutors asked for two years. pic.twitter.com/FNsiL6oqI9

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 22, 2022

This clip was very concerning as well, with Hawley noting that Jackson viewed the 18-year-old defendant as a “peer” of the young children portrayed.

Absolutely BRUTAL questions from @HawleyMO to Judge Jackson as he recites her own words back to her:

"Judge, he was 18. These kids are 8. I don't see in what sense they're peers." pic.twitter.com/Xk9gZO4rtU

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) March 22, 2022

Now, I think that her responses on all of this are woefully deficient, especially because of the nature of the crimes. But the White House must have thought the GOP line of questioning was affecting the support for the nominee because they came out with an attempt to defend her on Tuesday. But talk about a bad take! White House Deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates attacked Hawley by saying the concern about the lax sentences from Jackson was an “embarrassing, QAnon-signaling smear.”

Wow. The White House itself says that questioning Jackson on sentencing in child porn cases is “QAnon-signaling.” This is a really unwise decision. https://t.co/wThwaayT8O

— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) March 22, 2022

You can talk about the nature of her sentences, and argue back and forth about whether they were lax or not. What you can’t argue about is the reality that these were real child porn convictions that Bates is downplaying with that kind of response. Does he truly think that’s a winning take for the large majority of Americans who believe child pornography to be a very serious crime? Does he truly think it’s a winning strategy to be supportive of lax sentences? Biden is already getting smacked in the polls by Americans who think he is soft on crime and now the White House just added more to it with this ridiculous statement.

Now not only did the White House put out this dumb take, they must have also sent out the talking points because it’s now being repeated in media, with CNN and MSNBC personalities pushing the narrative.

Here’s Joy Reid going all-in.

What @HawleyMO is doing right now is a direct shout out to Qanon & the right wing fanatics who want to ban Toni Morrison books & books by LGBTQ authors. He wants to smear Judge #KetanjiBrownJackson as soft on child pornography bc that’s the Q narrative Republicans are running on.

— Joy-Ann (Pro-Democracy) Reid 😷 (@JoyAnnReid) March 22, 2022

And of all people to put his hand in on this, Jeffrey Toobin was who CNN had propounding on the subject. Just maybe not the best guy under the circumstances? And how is he still on CNN?

As predictable as it is stupid:

CNN's Jeffrey Toobin says Hawley's entire line of questioning against Judge Jackson "is about appealing to the QAnon audience," parroting White House talking points almost verbatim. pic.twitter.com/wo1Q1XFq3Z

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) March 22, 2022

So for all these clueless people: Americans don’t care about your narratives, they do know that child porn is wrong. And all they see is you guys seemingly downplaying lax sentences. Not a good look at all. How to stick your foot in things more than Joe Biden already has.