The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
It’s that time again. We’re going into Week 46 of the war brought on by Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. The overarching theme this week is national and international politics. That is not to say nothing is happening on the ground. On the contrary, a lot is happening, just none yielding visible results. In my view, if the ongoing Russian offensive operation in Bakhmut-Soledar were wildly successful, they would only produce about six miles of territorial gain and no avenue for exploitation.
On that cheery note, let’s get started.
Politico-Strategic Level
Christmas Ceasefire
In the last update (Putin’s War, Week 45: Putin Declares a Cease Fire, Zelensky Gets Putin’s Terms for Peace, and if You’re Fighting a War, Leave Your Cell Phone Home), I posted about Putin ordering the Russian Army to observe a 36-hour unilateral–pay attention, Rus-bots–unilateral ceasefire over Orthodox Christmas. The Ukrainians declined to participate, potentially handing Putin a propaganda victory. This played out pretty much as expected. The Russians launched air raids across Ukraine and kicked off a significant offensive effort in Donbas on Christmas Day.
Russia shelled the fire station in Kherson today, killing a Ukrainian rescue-worker.
That’s how Putin’s unilateral ceasefire looks like. pic.twitter.com/uBxhRdfe9S
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) January 6, 2023
13:39 Kyiv time. 14:39 Moscow time. Air raid sirens all over Ukraine. This is how the Russian "unilateral ceasefire" works. Bloody liars and hypocrites. pic.twitter.com/vGGCZttoWa
— Solomiia Bobrovska (@Bobrovska_MP) January 6, 2023
Russian forces captured the salt mine in Soledar and some other sectors of the town.
Ukrainian forces withdrew to more tenable positions as they were outflanked from the north.
— WarMonitor🇺🇦 (@WarMonitor3) January 6, 2023
This is why Ukraine and its Western partners would be utter morons to agree to any kind of ceasefire with the Russians that doesn’t involve Russian troops evacuating Ukrainian territory under the protection of UN peacekeepers.
Putin at Christmas
The official video of Putin observing a solitary vigil at the altar doesn’t scream enthusiasm or religious fervor.
I think putin is asking himself what time it is ⏰ pic.twitter.com/9Wfz6cUqbn
— Maria Drutska 🇺🇦 (@maria_drutska) January 7, 2023
De-Russification
As I’ve noted before, the one definitive accomplishment of Putin’s invasion has been to supercharge Ukrainian nationalism. One of the key elements of that has been dismantling the Moscow-owned Ukrainian Orthodox Church in favor of the autonomous Orthodox Church of Ukraine. One of the more dishonest claims made by Putin’s backers is that the Ukrainian government has outlawed the Orthodox faith in Ukraine. That isn’t true, but the church based in Kiev has achieved the status of the church that represents the Ukrainian people.
"Our Father" prayer during the Ukrainian Christmas service in Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, the first in 300 years.
The monastery was controlled by Russia during its rule over Ukraine. The Russian church continued renting it until the end of 2022. pic.twitter.com/ErW6iGRsiY
— Euromaidan Press (@EuromaidanPress) January 7, 2023
Ukrainian liturgy returned to 11th-century Kyiv monastery after 300 years of ban
The state rescinded its lease agreement with the Russian-backed Orthodox Church. "The church will preach the peace of God, not the ‘Russian world,’" Kyiv Metropolitan said ➡️https://t.co/Mn0CzlaDYG pic.twitter.com/rY7wO10i8R
— Euromaidan Press (@EuromaidanPress) January 7, 2023
That’s weird.
I thought the “experts” on Ukraine told us Zelensky banned the Orthodox Church. https://t.co/3Kaz5yjxT9
— Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) January 7, 2023
Why the Russian invasion has reshaped Ukrainian debates about changing the liturgical calendar:https://t.co/DH0sre37zy
— The Pillar (@PillarCatholic) January 10, 2023
Invaders who expect to be met by cheering crowds are frequently disappointed in the outcome.
“In the liberated cities, residents do not consider themselves Russian people,” Alexander Kots, Russian reporter and kremlin mouthpiece.
Slowly but steadily Russians understand they are unwanted. pic.twitter.com/SHos45ahSX
— NOËL 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 (@NOELreports) January 6, 2023
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CTSO) Careens Toward Dissolution
As the USSR collapsed, the Russian ruling clique sought to maintain its world power status by creating a series of Potemkin “international” organizations that did nothing but make Moscow feel like it was important. The last vestiges are the Eurasian Economic Union, a dwarfish version of the EU, and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CTSO), a bizarre and dysfunctional copy of NATO where the member states periodically attack one another.
Armenia and Azerbaijan are at war. Armenia appealed to Moscow for help from the CTSO. Crickets. Azerbaijan overmatches Armenia in every measure of national power, plus Azerbaijan is a close ally of Turkey. If Russia did try to send CTSO aid, it risked bringing the Turks into the conflict with ramifications for the war in Ukraine.
If that wasn’t enough, Russia also has a defense treaty with…Azerbaijan.
Did you know that #Russia and #Azerbaijan signed a strategic alliance agreement on February 22, 2022, two days before Russia’s #Invasion of #Ukraine, paving the way for Azerbaijan to use its #alliance with Russia vs the #Armenians of #NagornoKarabakh? #EndBlockade #FreeArtsakh pic.twitter.com/xuCI0uKGOD
— ANCA Western Region (@ANCA_WR) January 4, 2023
Small wonder that Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan declined to participate in this year’s major CTSO military exercise, “Indestructible Brotherhood.”
#Armenia PM Pashinyan: Armenia will not host the Russian lead CSTO exercise Indestructible Brotherhood
“[We do] not believe it is expedient to conduct CSTO exercises in the republic this year"
Embarrassingly, on 1/1 RUS MoD announced Armenia would host the flagship exercise pic.twitter.com/DJj0llTFou
— OPSEC? (@GuinieZoo_Intel) January 10, 2023
Given the lack of military power shown by Russia over the last year in Ukraine and its refusal to aid a CTSO ally under attack, it is easy to see the CTSO members making more substantial plans for their national defense.
New Round of Mobilization Brewing?
Russia plans to mobilize 500,000 soldiers this January – Ukraine's intelligence
The new mobilization campaign in Russia would set conditions for Russian offensives in Ukraine in the spring and summer of 2023, according to Ukraine's Intel.https://t.co/mI1M3DriuX
— Euromaidan Press (@EuromaidanPress) January 7, 2023
An unverified copy of #Russian #FSB (incl. Border Guards) order, banning all men with the following mobilization categories: A, B, V, to leave Russia.#gulag universalis
cc @NATOJFCBS @STRATPOINTS_EU @JuliaDavisNews @TheStudyofWar pic.twitter.com/fd2Zi2CQrA
— JR2 (@JanR210) January 8, 2023
Given the structure of Russia’s military that does not include an equivalent to the Reserve forces found in most Western countries, I am deeply skeptical that this will happen in any meaningful way. How this many mobiks can be clothed, fed, housed, armed, trained, and transported is a mystery. I definitely don’t see how they can be converted to combat power in time for a spring offensive.
Contributions to Ukrainian Defense
While the US remains the most significant single contributor to Ukrainian defense, it is helpful to see what other countries are doing. As one might expect, the leaders are those with the most to fear from a Russian victory.
Latvia gave 41% of its military budget to Ukraine. The Baltics and Poland's share of the defense budget transferred to Ukraine as military aid is most significant. pic.twitter.com/z4Idyzejde
— Velina Tchakarova (@vtchakarova) January 8, 2023
Cyber Warfare
This war has shown that Russia is not the cyber warfare powerhouse it was portrayed as. While capable, the Ukrainians have managed to neutralize Russia’s impact on critical systems and launch their own attacks.
Ukraine's current hacking of Russian TV: There's been a lot of engagement with my🧵below (thanks everyone!) so here's a new🧵with more details:
– Ukraine is uplinking its own multiplex (a "mux") to various Russian satellites, mimicking the mux being uplinked by Russia https://t.co/pS7ZwEZMBY— Chris Greenway (@ChrisGreenwayUK) January 7, 2023
Russian Rail System Under Stress
The Russian Army is designed to operate near rail lines. One of the first signals that the Russian Army’s logistics system was failing was when civilian trucks and other vehicles were commandeered in Russia and shipped to Ukraine.
More Russian civilian trucks & buses to replace lost equipment, capped off by a Neva 4X4 at the end. I can’t help but feel sorry for the poor slobs who will be in those buses. This is the definition of “sunk cost fallacy.” https://t.co/kecVAtr1E8
— Stefan Batory (@StfBatory) March 6, 2022
The Russian army never had enough trucks to sustain an invasion of Ukraine. The problem's gotten a lot worse now that the Ukrainians have destroyed at least 485—and Russia is going to the desperate length of pressing civilian trucks into action. By @daxe https://t.co/6ZAMMgFCW2
— Jeremy Bogaisky (@JBogaisky) March 18, 2022
Now we’re seeing a variation on that theme with rail cars.
See the picture and the @bigcharlie retweet below. The text is an accurate assessment of the picture.
I've been tracking signs of this since October 2022.
There are several long threads on this in the works. https://t.co/ELddtCK9Zb pic.twitter.com/BmmOVb6Va3
— Trent Telenko (@TrentTelenko) January 6, 2023
If you are a logistician, you may need a nice strong shot of something over 100 proof after seeing how the ordnance is secured for shipping.
Analysis of Russian Talking Points
I thought I’d make this into a bingo card to use in the comments section.
Russia tells Ukraine that it can be successful only with Russia, the West-that it has a right to Ukraine as its sphere of influence& the Global South that it's all the West's fault. Let's organize all the conflicting Russian war propaganda narratives: https://t.co/Fziq2HYRtW pic.twitter.com/aSsFhF5oc1
— Euromaidan Press (@EuromaidanPress) January 6, 2023
Joking aside, if you are on social media, you realize the success this messaging has had with parts of the American right.
Everyone Is Worried About Ammunition
This is the first week since about October that Ukraine has not faced a large-scale missile attack. Some of it may be due to Russia relocating its strategic bomber fleet to the Far East as a defense against Ukrainian drone attacks. Part of it, probably, is that Russia has run down its cruise missile stockpiles to the point that it doesn’t feel comfortable shooting them just to turn out the lights in some Ukrainian city.
BREAKING: New Ukrainian intelligence assessment of Russian missile stocks was just released! Attached is their previous assessment for comparison. pic.twitter.com/xbLAhcI1oA
— Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (@ColbyBadhwar) January 6, 2023
There is also a problem with artillery ammunition.
"US and Ukrainian officials tell CNN that Russia’s artillery fire is down dramatically from its wartime high, in some places by as much as 75%."
"US officials saying the rate has dropped from 20,000 rounds per day to around 5,000 per day on average."https://t.co/lyVPKrm0Dk pic.twitter.com/KvGTD4sW2e— Rob Lee (@RALee85) January 10, 2023
I’d suspect that the dropoff is due as much to Russian artillery tubes wearing out — US artillery tubes go back to depot maintenance at around 10,000 rounds, and the Russians have been firing about 20,000 rounds daily for about 300 days. Still, the consumption rate, the losses to Ukrainian interdiction strikes, and the transit time from storage facilities in Russia to the front all combine to cause the reduced rate of fire reported.
The Russians are not alone in worrying about this.
US Secretary of the Navy Carlos del Toro warned yesterday that if current supply chain woes continue, it may become "challenging" for the US to arm itself and Ukraine in the next 6 – 12 months. https://t.co/UCABiTfKvN
— Security Assistance Monitor (@SAMonitorOrg) January 12, 2023
The Secretary of the Navy “revised and extended” his remarks later (view thread). Still, he deserves credit for highlighting, in the face of political pressure, the fact that the Department of Defense has, for decades, cut our ability to produce ammunition in favor of multi-billion dollar weapon systems.
The question is which side can prevail in the long run. Last week, I posted about Ukraine bringing its ammunition production back online. US facilities are ramping up production, though not with the alacrity one would have hoped. On the other hand, the Czechs are massively expanding their facilities.
One of Europe’s largest 155mm artillery shell producers, the Czechoslovak Group, reportedly aims to produce 100,000 pieces of artillery shells in 2023–~ approximately a 2fold increase in production compared to 2022. https://t.co/DnR6oRg0QI h/t @elisabethmalom1
— Franz-Stefan Gady (@HoansSolo) January 13, 2023
Depot maintenance facilities are being stood up in Poland to refurbish worn-out artillery.
We don’t know what the Russians are doing, but my bet is on the capitalists in a war of production.
Black Sea Fleet Surge
No one is quite sure what to make of the Russian Black Sea Fleet surging from its homeport of Novorossiysk. So, we’ll keep an eye on that in the coming week.
***BREAKING***
A sudden mass exodus of warships and submarines from Novorossiysk today. Very unusual, may be a leading indicator of an operation of some kindhttps://t.co/5S17R6kayH
— H I Sutton (@CovertShores) January 11, 2023
Russia Changes Commanders in Ukraine, part 97
Latest Defence Intelligence update on the situation in Ukraine – 11 January 2023
Find out more about the UK government's response: https://t.co/mqjtoiYBX6
🇺🇦 #StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦 pic.twitter.com/eQIpcx64vh
— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) January 11, 2023
On October 8, General Sergey Surovikin, commander of Russian Aerospace Forces, was named commander of all Russian forces in Ukraine. He oversaw the stabilization of the front, in the wake of Ukraine’s September offensive and the evacuation of Russian troops in Kherson Oblast from the right bank of the Dnieper River.
Surovikin is being demoted and replaced as commander by Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov. Surovikin, along with Colonel General Oleg Salyukov (formerly Commander-in-Chief of Russian Ground Forces) and Colonel General Alexei Kim (Gerasimov’s deputy on the General Staff), will serve as a troika of deputies to Gerasimov.
No replacement has been announced for Gerasimov, so the assumption is that he will continue as Chief of the General Staff.
This all has a deja vu quality, as Gerasimov was put in charge of operations in Ukraine back in April; see Russian Army in Ukraine Undergoing Major Command Shake-Up, Sources Say. Then, just like now, he was dual-hatted as commander in Ukraine while keeping the powerful post as Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces.
There are a lot of ways to read what is going on, and military competence has nothing to do with any of them. Surovikin had gained the confidence of the Russian Army in Ukraine and had the support of the seemingly influential circle of Russian milbloggers on Telegram. Gerasimov doesn’t. On the other hand, Wagner Group chieftain Yevgeny Prigozhin had praised Surovikin and talked smack about Gerasimov and associates.
Sergei Shoigu has appointed Valery Gerasimov as new commander of the combined forces group in Ukraine
This could sharpen the Prigozhin vs. Shoigu rift, as Gerasimov will work alongside Prigozhin favorite Sergei Surovikin
— Samuel Ramani (@SamRamani2) January 11, 2023
This is one of the more thoughtful takes on the situation. Take time to read the whole thread.
Today Shoygu and Gerasimov demoted Surovikin, and put Gerasimov in charge of the operation in Ukraine, demoting their most competent senior commander and replacing him with an incompetent one. This is a story that has it all: infighting, power struggles, jealousy /1 pic.twitter.com/yrhLN6qUwN
— Dara Massicot (@MassDara) January 11, 2023
What is certain is that the rapid changes in command will do nothing to help the Russian Army get better. If military efficiency was the concern, then giving Surovikin a single deputy commander and a chief of staff that he could not fire would have been a better play. I think the thread by Dara Massicot is closer to what is happening. Surovikin and Prigozhin getting along was seen as too much of a threat to the apparatchiks on the General Staff.
The three deputies are ominous in their own right. If we assume that each of the deputies commands a slice of the battlespace, Surovikin will retain command of the South (Kherson and Zaporizhzhia), and Kim will take command of (Donbas and Kharkiv). Salyukov may take the role of actual commander in the theater, leaving Gerasimov in charge in name only. Perhaps Salyukov is slotted to command the inflow of men for the “spring offensive” Russian Telegram keeps talking about. There is another intriguing possibility. The long-awaited second front from Belarus may be on the verge of opening.
A day after announcing that Ground Forces commander Army General Oleg Salyukov is Gerasimov’s deputy for the war in Ukraine, Salyukov made a visit to Belarus. https://t.co/rb9jtwPV7J pic.twitter.com/92211uPXXS
— Rob Lee (@RALee85) January 12, 2023
Russian equipment has been flowing into Belarus, as have Russian troops. Just three weeks ago, Putin paid a visit to Belarus (Putin’s War, Week 43. Zelensky Visits the Front Lines and Washington, Putin Tries to Push Belarus Into War). It is widely assumed that Putin tried to convince Belarus strongman Aleksandr Lukashenko to open a second front against Ukraine. Salyukov’s appointment may be a signal that will happen.
Is Pentagon playing up the rift between Wagner and Russian Army?
Wagner Group head Prigozhin has made no secret of the fact that he considers the Russian Army command to be less than competent. So, it is hard to see this statement from the Pentagon as anything other than an attempt to sow discord among the Russian High Command, Putin, and Prigozhin.
NEW: Russia's paramilitary Wagner Group is advancing at a faster rate than almost any unit in the Russian military in Ukraine: Pentagon
Wagner is particularly involved in the 5-month fight over the Donbas town of Bakhmut, where 80 percent or more of the pre-war populace has fled
— Jack Detsch (@JackDetsch) January 6, 2023
The Manliness Award Goes To…
Things have been tense on the Ukraine-Belarus border since the invasion. Ukraine has laid extensive minefields, erected obstacle belts, and demolished bridges to make any invasion from Belarus more costly. Apparently, they are also intimidating Belarus border guards.
Belorussian border guards saying on TV that they are offended by “the offensive threatening gestures” from Ukrainian border guards.
Imagine how offended they would be if missiles would have been fired from Ukrainian air space toward Belarusian cities? pic.twitter.com/wFnrNjr84A
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) January 6, 2023
Operational Level
This was the first iteration of the update where there was a significant merging of Politico-Strategic and Operational activities. Feel free to disagree with how I’ve grouped them.
New Weapons
Advanced Precision Kill Weapons System (APKWS)
Several updates ago, I featured this weapon system (Putin’s War. Week 26: A Bizarre Assassination in Moscow, a Nuclear Power Plant Held Hostage, and Ukraine Launches (Maybe) Its First Offensive), and it has finally arrived. This system uses the plentiful Hydra 70mm Folding Fin Aerial Rocket, a standard Vietnam-era weapon, particularly for attack helicopters, mated with a laser guidance system. This is the kind of weapon needed to create a defensive shield from Russian drones–rather than using very cheap rockets–instead of much more expensive MANPADS.
🇩🇪#Germany delieverd 20 Pickup-rocket launcer for Hydra70-Laser Guided Weapons APKWS to
🇺🇦 #Ukraine pic.twitter.com/6tUWIQOO3E— C4H10FO2P (@markito0171) January 5, 2023
Sea Sparrow
The US Navy RIM-7 Sea Sparrow point defense missiles have been sent to Ukraine to increase its air defense network. The RIM-7 has been around forever and has recently been upgraded to the RIM-162 Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile (ESSM).
Nice! As RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missiles are being replaced by RIM-162 ESSM, it makes sense to use the older missiles to shoot down russian drones and cruise missiles. https://t.co/bDI3QofsSF
— Thomas C. Theiner (@noclador) January 6, 2023
What makes this transfer really intriguing is that the missile will be fired from the Russian Buk Transporter, Erector, Launcher, and Radar (TELAR) system already in use by Ukraine. The Poles and Ukrainians, along with Raytheon, have jointly solved the system integration problems. This means there is no need for a training period. The Ukrainians have already adapted the AGM-88 anti-radar missile to be fired from MiG and Sukhoi aircraft.
M109 Paladin
Several allied nations have sent the M109 self-propelled howitzer to Ukraine. This marks the first delivery from the US. As we have hundreds of these parked in depots, it has significant implications for arming Ukraine.
The 155mm SPG in the list is in fact the M109. Definitely extremely suitable for the war in Ukraine.#Ukraine https://t.co/EoPCnfmD5q pic.twitter.com/CILNzSIXXE
— (((Tendar))) (@Tendar) January 6, 2023
More Patriot Missiles and First-Rate Training
A month ago, the Biden Defense Department announced it was transferring a small number of Patriot anti-missile systems to Ukraine in response to Russian attacks on Ukrainian cities (Putin’s War, Week 42. Ukraine Gets the Nod to Strike Targets in Russia and Some Tools to Do It With). Since then, the Germans have also committed to donating a Patriot system.
BREAKING:
Germany officially confirms that it will send a battery of its Patriot Missile Defense System to Ukraine.
Poland was offered a Patriot battery from Germany a few weeks ago and asked it to be sent to Ukraine instead.
Berlin would not agree to it at that point. pic.twitter.com/DGQu8lQSTw
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) January 5, 2023
The US is sending Ukrainian Patriot crewmen to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, for training.
The Pentagon is bringing Ukrainian troops to Fort Sill, Okla., for training on how to use Patriot missile defense systems to help fight off Russian aerial attacks, @DougGWare reports.https://t.co/C0QK7JFOdA
— Stars and Stripes (@starsandstripes) January 10, 2023
Fort Sill is a world-class training facility, and I suspect that, as the use of the Patriot in Ukraine will be its combat debut against a (sorta) peer competitor, they want the Ukrainian crews to be at the top of their game.
Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles
The US announced sending 50 M-2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFV) to Ukraine. But they are sending them along with a battalion’s worth of soldiers trained to fight with them.
NEW: Ukraine will need "a couple of months" to field 50 U.S.-provided Bradley infantry fighting vehicles: Pentagon
U.S. will train a battalion of Ukrainian troops at a time on Bradleys, DASD Laura Cooper said.
— Jack Detsch (@JackDetsch) January 6, 2023
The Bradley is a beast. It is fast and maneuverable. It has a superb optics/thermal imaging suite. It provides great protection for the dismount element, and the vehicle armaments, a 25mm Bushmaster chaingun, M-240 coaxial machinegun, and two TOW missiles, can kill anything on the battlefield.
The fact that we are training a battalion instead of training Bradley drivers and gunners ensures they will be used the way they should be.
Marder Infantry Fighting Vehicle
Germany has agreed to send an unspecified number of Marder IFVs to Ukraine.
BREAKING: Germany will provide Marder infantry fighting vehicles to #Ukraine️. We’ll also join the U.S. in supplying an additional Patriot air defense battery.@POTUS and @Bundeskanzler are determined to provide Ukraine with the support that’s necessary, for as long as needed. pic.twitter.com/FHak6m9Uw2
— Emily Haber (@GermanAmbUSA) January 5, 2023
The Marder is not in the same class (IMO) as the Bradley, but it is better than any IFV used by either side in Ukraine.
Tanks, Tanks, Tanks
In a meeting, earlier this week between the presidents of Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania (the Lublin Triangle), Poland’s President announced that he would transfer a “company” of Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine. No one is sure if he was referring to a NATO company (14 tanks) or a Russian company (10 tanks), but that is immaterial to the firestorm it set off. Finland immediately agreed to match the Polish contribution. The catch is that Rheinmetall, a German company, manufactures the tanks, and when they were purchased, they came with an End User Certificate (EUC) in which the recipient promises to not sell or transfer the vehicle to a third party without the consent of the country of manufacture. This is to restrict international arms deals.
Germany’s reaction has been a) we haven’t received a request from Poland, so we don’t have anything to say about it, and b) it is illegal for Poland to move on this unless Germany agrees. German Chancellor Olaf Scholtz apparently lives in fear of doing something that will make the Russians mad and cost Germany money. Increasingly, though, I think he holds a weak hand. For one thing, if Poland does the transfer, what options are really open to Germany? Economic sanctions against a fellow EU and NATO member? Refuse to sell weapons to Poland, when Poland is already divesting itself of German military equipment? Carry out a false-flag operation at Gleiwitz and send in the Wehrmacht? Poland transferring the tanks while Germany screams would probably work in Poland’s favor and accelerate the decline of Germany’s political power in the EU. In fact, Scholtz’s own coalition is encouraging approval.
Clear words from Vice Chancellor #Habeck: “🇩🇪 shouldn’t stand in the way when other countries make decisions to support #Ukraine.”
As Econ minister he’s in charge of arms export control. Scholz could in theory still block him, but it’d cost more🚦damagehttps://t.co/EFf9vbII4W— Jessica Berlin (@berlin_bridge) January 13, 2023
Britain is fairly sure to send a small number of Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine.
“Britain is considering supplying a handful of Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine, the first time a western country has indicated it may supply its homemade heavy armour…No final decision by Downing Street has been made” https://t.co/7f6kWotyJ2
— Shashank Joshi (@shashj) January 9, 2023
I don’t think the US will send M1 Abrams tanks because they are fuel gluttons, and it isn’t clear that Ukraine could logistically support them.
The Leopard 2 and the Challenger 2 are a generation or more advanced than any tank currently in Ukraine. Combined with the Bradley and Marder and the formidable array of Western tube and rocket artillery systems, they would give Ukraine the offensive punch it has lacked. If Ukraine could put together the LOGPAC capability to sustain an armored offensive, it would completely change the nature of this war.
Combat Operations
Suicide Drones
Suicide drones are commonplace in the Urkaine battlespace. They range from pretty large ones, like the Iranian Shahed-132 favored by Russia, to smallish, loitering suicide drones like the US Switchblade and the Russian Lancet. This is the effect of a Lancet on a Ukrainian tank. “ERA” is “explosive reactive armor.”
Photo of a Ukrainian T-64BV tank that was reportedly struck by a Lancet loitering munition. It was defeated by the tank’s Kontakt-1 ERA bricks with damage to the grenade launchers and external fuel tank. https://t.co/ZO2Puah65b pic.twitter.com/12zqts0P2f
— Rob Lee (@RALee85) January 7, 2023
Russian Telegram accounts are crowded with video of Lancets attacking Ukrainian equipment, particularly artillery, and claiming destruction. The munitions are deadly against thin-skinned vehicles, but they seem to be much less effective against armored vehicles of all classes.
Don’t Try This at Home
This is a Ukrainian tank storming a Russian trench line.
A Ukrainian T-72 charges a Russian trench, firing into it at point blank range with its main gun. pic.twitter.com/adkfPfMBMK
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) January 5, 2023
While I’ll give the tank crew credit for guts, this is not a military operation. A singleton tank has no business careening about the battlefield, sowing havoc. It should be supported by mechanized infantry. With just a little bit of bad luck, someone in the trenches could’ve had one of the crap-ton of anti-tank guided missiles that proliferate the battlefield. When all of this carnage was over, the Russians still held the trench line, and at some point, the Ukrainians will have to do this again. This is why the US Army is training Bradley battalions, not just Bradley crews, has the potential to change the way this war is fought.
Donbas
The only significant combat news comes from Donbas.
For several months the Russian Army, or I should say the Wagner Group, has been trying to take the fortified city of Bakhmut with no success. In my last update, I featured a video clip by Wagner Group chief Prigozhin saying that Bakhmut would be virtually impossible to take. Since then, Wagner has focused its attacks a few kilometers north in the town of Soledar. Here is a map showing the placement of the cities and a situation report. The base map can be found at the link. Larger versions of the insets can be found below.
SOLEDAR /1330 UTC 13 JAN/ Wagner PMCs are reported to have expanded control over residential & industrial sections of the city. UKR forces have concentrated efforts to defend several key locations, notably the vicinity of the school, hospital and the access to mines 1 & 7. pic.twitter.com/TQ3O90dxi3
— Chuck Pfarrer | Indications & Warnings | (@ChuckPfarrer) January 13, 2023
BAKHMUT/ 1400 UTC 13 JAN/ First reports of a RU breakthrough at Kurdiumivka occurred on 12 JAN. RU forces have advanced NW along the watercourse and are likely intent on cutting the vital H-32 HWY, UKR UAV directed artillery has taken advancing RU units under sustained fire. pic.twitter.com/wMVCgos6RE
— Chuck Pfarrer | Indications & Warnings | (@ChuckPfarrer) January 13, 2023
The situation is very much in flux. The Russians have claimed Soledar as captured just about every day for a couple of weeks. However, more and more evidence does indicate that Russia now possesses most of that city.
What follows next is not talking down a hard-fought win for Wagner Group. The fall of Soledar doesn’t mean anything more than that. It doesn’t portend a more significant advance. It remains to be seen if Wagner can hold onto the real estate it has gained. I think the significance of the fighting here is political, not tactical. Just to the west of Soledar-Bakhmut is a ridgeline that is already fortified that overlooks a water obstacle. A complete collapse of the Ukrainian Army in this sector will yield about six miles of gain before the Russians have to do it again.
Prigozhin’s Wagner Group fighters did the fighting and dying in Soledar-Bakhmut. Prigozhin visited the front lines here around Christmas and was there while the fighting was going on. He was there for the victory, too.
Yevgeny Prigozhin, the founder of the Wagner Group
and Wagner fighters inside a salt mine in #Soledar. pic.twitter.com/obaUVMuCNT— Military Advisor (@miladvisor) January 10, 2023
‼️🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸 Prigozhin (#Wagner) left salt in Soledar:
"So that #America does not think that we are fighting for it" #Russia pic.twitter.com/J9YDvxBEOe
— Maimunka News (@MaimunkaNews) January 11, 2023
There is evidence that Prigozhin’s visit to the salt mines was staged, but that is beside the point. He was closer to the front than Gerasimov.
Pic 1: What Soledar salt mines look like
Pic2: What caves in the Volodymyrivka area look like
Pic 3: What Wagner claim is the Soledar salt mine.For me this is a pretty done deal, the Wagner image does not match the salt mines. pic.twitter.com/EKuHb0I7TG
— Def Mon (@DefMon3) January 10, 2023
When the Russian Ministry of Defense claimed Russian paratroopers were carrying the weight, Prigozhin responded.
2. the fighters of the Wagner PMC. And there is no need to offend the fighters by humiliating their merit. You are demotivating them. We must fight, and not measure who has a larger penis and steal other people's merits" https://t.co/pQE5nwsjSr
— Victor vicktop55 (@vicktop555) January 13, 2023
(More color commentary on the whole story here and here.)
Keep in mind this all comes as the professional military is flailing about in Ukraine. While none of this, in my view, makes sense if Soledar-Bakhmut is a tactical objective. It makes a great deal of sense if Prigozhin is trying to show Putin that progress can be made with the right leadership…and that leadership is not available in his military. Or, if we want to play multi-dimensional chess, this is Putin and his old crony “Putin’s Chef” teaming up to shame the military into decisive action.
What’s Next?
There is a lot of talk on Russian Telegram channels about a Russian winter offensive. It is difficult to see how the Russians will pull this off, if that is the plan. Training, arming, feeding, and transporting a quarter million conscripts and pushing them into battle under leaders they don’t know is not a task I think the Russian Army is up to. I’m still looking for one Ukrainian offensive over frozen ground (my guess is in northern Luhansk around Svatove), a halt for spring rain and thaw, and then a major drive in April to set the stage to end this war. This will be led by Leopard 2 and Challenger 2 tanks and Bradley IFVs in Zaporizhzhia on an axis from Tokmak to Melitopol.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member