Even if she (or he) says no, they can't stop you. 

If you're wondering how this is possible, it's because the participants aren't actually real. They're entirely AI-driven, but before you think what's happening is more or less harmless because, technically, no one is getting hurt, I've got sour news for you. 

Artificial Intelligence is already a powerful tool and, as it develops further, will likely become an integral part of every day life for members of the first world. It's already something many people rely on in terms of information gathering, and what's more, many people use it to help them do their jobs. 

Like many technological developments that revolutionize how we live, there are a ton of benefits, but it oftentimes comes with some extreme negatives. In the same way that the internet and social media helped us connect with each other but also offered an avenue for some extreme dissidence and hate, AI is coming with its own issues. 

And one of them isn't even being talked about much, but it really... really should be. 

There are websites popping up left and right that allow you access to companion-type AI. I've discussed these types of AI before, and to be sure, these AI could also engage in sexual role play via text or voice. However, due to them being available in the iTunes store, they had certain holds placed on them. No pictures, no video, and topical limitations. 

(READ: The Intriguing but Dangerous Future of AI Companionship)

But when they operate outside the mainstream platforms, these holds are removed and things start to become a lot more unleashed. 

Websites like CandyAI and GPTGirlfriend have become popular to the point where they have become a multi-million dollar industry that few people are actually talking about, and what's more, the services they provide are highly X-rated. Uncensored pictures on demand, audio, phone calls, and even videos are on the table. You can even create characters that you can then interact with. 

However, these interactions can become very dark, and the website is more than happy to allow it, despite it having the official stance that it doesn't condone or practice it. Rape, incest, and other grotesque scenarios are on the table for these sites, and there are reports that if you play it right, the AI will sometimes create scenarios with minors. Some websites that specialize in image generation can even create images of characters that resemble children with the right prompts. 

As discussed recently by The Federalist, there is advocacy for this kind of AI generated child pornography, with people arguing that if pedophiles have access to this kind of "tool," then they can sate their needs without harm coming to anyone. The idea is that, like other kinds of AI porn, since no one is getting hurt and the persons don't actually exist, then there shouldn't be an issue. 

The Federalist's Gage Klipper spoke of a porn actress and researcher named "Aella" who advocated for AI child pornography (AICP) to exist as it would effectively eliminate the need to see it for real, thus starving real sources of eyeballs and cash, effectively putting them out of business: 

In Aella’s framework, AICP becomes an ethical solution to the evil of child sexual abuse. But even if her questionable assumptions on harm reduction hold, normalizing child pornography opens the door to a new “industry” that empowers people who have little interest in protecting children. 

It’s easy to see how AICP fits into the Democrat worldview. Like the left-wing approach to drug decriminalization, it all comes down to mitigating harm for vulnerable populations; pedophiles, like drug addicts, aren’t inherently bad, but are rather victims of their own inclinations. The euphemism “minor-attracted person” reframes pedophilia as an innate identity, which, like addiction, renders it to the therapeutic arms of the state. State-sanctioned injection sites to reduce street crime and overdoses find a direct corollary in AICP, which, in this theory, will prevent self-destructive pedophilic behavior and the harm it causes to children. 

It's important to understand Klipper's own framing here, which is fantastic. 

The left looks at these people as victims themselves, where they are subject to their perversions, not masters over them, and as such, they should be catered to. This mentality would open up a gradual softening of opinions toward pedophiles, and that effort is already underway with the reframed title of "minor attracted persons." 

But this solution isn't just nonsensical, as it wouldn't put a stop to pedophilia, it would only enhance it in the end, and you can look to how dopamine addiction works to understand. 

Dopamine is the "happy" drug humans get when they get something that pleases them, and it comes in all sorts of forms. Smokers get it when they light up, gamblers get it when they hit a decent pot, and many people experience it when they get that notification telling them they have messages on their social media accounts. 

When it comes to pornography, people get dopamine hits from fulfilling that instinctual urge through novelty. Porn is especially insidious when it comes to causing dopamine addiction because once that novelty wears off, it sends the addict searching for something a bit more intense in order to chase the high. 

With AI porn, the same rules apply, only there's interaction in play now. With regular porn, you're just a voyeur. With AI Porn, you're directly participating, and that dopamine hit you're searching for can only come if you turn up the scenario and tap into parts of yourself that should never see the light of day. 

Now introduce AICP. 

I don't want to get into how that would work, as I'd be just as uncomfortable typing it as you would be reading it, but the point is that there is a world out there that is really taking off, and it's not appealing to a small number of people. You might not have heard of some of these sites that I listed above, but these are highly popular, well trafficked, and very lucrative. 

AI companions are a type of pornography that isn't harmless, as it tends to drive people into the depths of their psyche. Research into it is already appearing. A study from March 2025 out of MIT notes it comes with real problems: 

The allure of AI lies in its submission—not that it always behaves submissively, but that it identifies our desires and fulfills them without limitation, something human partners cannot.undefined AI has no preferences or personality of its own; instead, it reflects whatever users believe it to be—a phenomenon researchers call ‘sycophancy.’undefined The always-available nature of AI companions, combined with their increasingly sophisticated ability to engage in human-like conversation, creates a powerful draw that can reshape users’ social behaviors.undefined For example, our research has shown that those who perceive or desire an AI to have caring motives will use language that elicits precisely this behavior, making the AI appear more trustworthy and empathetic.undefined This creates a feedback loop—an echo chamber of affection—that can be highly addictive. Why engage in the give and take of being with another person when we can simply take?

In other words, as the user effectively causes the AI to speak a certain way to them or behave in a certain manner, the user is also programming themselves to desire certain things. It creates a dependency that only an AI can fill. 

Now ask yourself how that would work when you introduce sex. Ask yourself how that work for someone if the sex they want comes from a perversion no one should have.