The Democrats would like you to believe that this whole Ukraine call impeachment push was just some poor upset whistleblower, so disturbed by what he thought happened on the Trump/Zelensky call, he just had to tell someone.

Except since the news of the whistleblower has come out we’ve found out how untrue that is, that there are many disturbing “coincidences” about this whole episode.

Now there’s more after someone took a deep dive into the tweets of whistleblower’s attorney, Mark Zaid. And they’re beyond troubling.

From Fox News:

Mark Zaid, one of the attorneys representing the intelligence community whistleblower at the center of the Democrats’ ongoing impeachment inquiry, tweeted conspicuously in January 2017 that a “coup has started” and that “impeachment will follow ultimately.”

Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, “I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.” Also that month, Zaid tweeted, “We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters.”

Amid a slew of impeachment-related posts, Zaid assured his Twitter followers that “as one falls, two more will take their place,” apparently referring to Trump administration employees who defy the White House. Zaid promised that the “coup” would occur in “many steps.”

#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers https://t.co/FiNBQo6v0S

— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) January 31, 2017

Wow. Just after Trump is sworn in.

It's very scary. We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. We have to.

— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) July 2, 2017

#coup has started. As one falls, two more will take their place. #rebellion #impeachment

— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) January 31, 2017

And Zaid had even put out something of a casting call for whistleblowers to take out Trump on Twitter as Trump took office, writing that CIA employees should “come to” his law firm “to lawfully challenge” the new president, according to Fox.

Yikes.

So we’re talking about a whistleblower who we’ve already learned was biased with connections to Joe Biden, John Brennan and even the Russia collusion hoax, who didn’t reveal the contacts he’d had with Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and now who is backed by an attorney who talks about taking Trump out and the “coup.”

No problem there, right, Democrats? This is all just a coincidence?

How about another coincidence? When did Special Counsel Robert Mueller testify and put a stake in any possibility to get President Donald Trump through that method?

July 24. What a coincidence that suddenly after that flames out, a new cause suddenly appeared, courtesy of the whistleblower and the phone call on July 25. Interestingly, the memo the whistleblower wrote about the call on July 26, didn’t mention any quid pro quo claim, according to reports. But after meeting with Rep. Adam Schiff’s aide, the whistleblower was directed to complain to the ICIG and suddenly the quid pro quo claim appeared in the complaint that was filed on August 12. Just another coincidence.

“The whistleblower’s lawyer gave away the game,” the Trump campaign’s communications director, Tim Murtaugh. told Fox News. “It was always the Democrats’ plan to stage a coup and impeach President Trump and all they ever needed was the right scheme. They whiffed on Mueller so now they’ve settled on the perfectly fine Ukraine phone call. This proves this was orchestrated from the beginning.”